
Yesterday I stumbled upon a National Geographic from January 1998. The cover article was about making sense of the closing millennium. Remember how cool it was to think, "in two years it's gonna be the year 2000, man!" The article was so intriguing that I swiped it from the waiting room. One of the sentences from the following excerpt about what human culture was like 1,000 years ago stayed with me for the rest of the day. See if you can guess which:
"Circa AD 1000: While far from creating a world culture, trade increasingly moves ideas. Scandinavians carry notions of a popular assembly to present-day Russia. It does not last. The chair becomes commonplace in China. Bean cultivation spreads in North America. The slave trade flourishes; Slavs and Africans are major sources. Ten percent of England's people are slaves, mostly from Europe. Economic hardship prompts many families to sell children"
The accompanying article in the "Human Culture" section of this "Making Sense of The Millennium" article is about modern day child slavery. But it was the sentence about the chair that I kept thinking about as the day went on. I hope that don't sound heartless. It's just never occurred to me how much I take chairs for granted. For all our luxuries, the chair is the one I can't live without. And to think, it's only one thousand years old. How far we've advanced.
But then I was listening to Coast to Coast (Yes, I'm a cool guy. Thanks for noticing.) later that night, and had to reconsider this view that we're living in an extraordinarily advanced culture. George Norry's guest was talking about how primitive our civilization is because we're not part of an inter-galactic government, a la Star Wars. There were also lots of Carl Sagen and Star Trek references in this discussion. So, which is it? Are we incredibly advanced, incredibly primitive?
The point is, the chair thing really put things in perspective for me. I'm damn glad I live in a time where chairs are available. But then there's also children being sold into slavery. How do I wrap my head around it all?
Well, one thing I do is listen to music.
I posted this review on HaveYouHeard.net last week. The band is Part Bear, the album is Par Bear. I gave it a favorable review and did enjoy listening to it, but I haven't listened to it since finishing up the review. So do I really like it? Only time will tell.
Did you know Limp Bizket is reuniting? For a band that I can't listen to, I've always appreciated Limp Bizkit. I was a camp counselor for 12 year old boys at the height of their popularity. The way the cool/nice kids who weren't popular held on to bands, specifically Korn, Blink 182, and Limp Bizket, astounded me. These were important bands to kids who were going through their coming of age years. This music spoke to them when they most needed someone to speak to them and them and say: you're not alone. Sure, the message may have been, "I also like the break stuff and pretend I'm a hip-hop/rock star," but it was a connection nonetheless. Slate.com posted an article in defense of Limp Bizkit in anticipation for what may be their second act.
Paul Shirley, the ex-NBA 12th man, wrote a similar defense of Nickleback last week.
Here's a video that was put up on HaveYouHeard.net this week. It's from the Hold Steady's keyboard player. I listened to the whole album earlier this week. My response after one listen: I happy with having the single on line, no need to listen to the whole thing again.
Ready to have your mind blown? Here's the caption from the picture at the start of this post, from the same Nat Geo:
"In pre-Columbian times, Native Americans etched the Mojave Desert with images of their creator, Mastamho, and his spirit helper, a mountain lion. Tire tracks from recreational vehicles add the scrawls of modernity."



